1. It should use the standard English (Latin+) alphabet – the absence of diacritics makes it easy to write using any technologySource: A Brief Introduction to Marshallese Phonology (via Far Outliers).
2. The values of the letters should approximate their pronunciation in well-known languages – leveraging existing knowledge
3. The overall system should be transparent – making it easy to explain and learn
Consonants: p, t, k, m, n, g, l, r
Semivowels: w, i, y
Vowels: a, e, o, u
Rules:
1. Consonantal rounding is marked by the letter: w.
2. Consonantal palatization is marked by the letter: i.
3. In syllable-initial position the w, i, follows the consonant, in syllable-final position it precedes it.
Consonants and semivowels:
| Labial | Dental | Velar | ||||
| Stops | Palatalized | pi, ip | ti, it | |||
| Velarized | p | t | k | |||
| Rounded | kw, wk | |||||
| Nasals | Palatalized | mi, im | ni, in | |||
| Velarized | m | n | g | |||
| Rounded | nw, wn | gw, wg | ||||
| Liquids | Palatalized |
|
||||
| Velarized |
|
|||||
| Rounded |
|
|||||
| Semivowels | Palatalized | i | ||||
| Velarized | y | |||||
| Rounded | w | |||||
Vowels:
| high | u |
| e | |
| o | |
| low | a |
(I have a suspicion that not all consonants appear in syllable-final position. If so, some of the digraphs in the chart would not be necessary.)
UPDATE: Of course, if an adequate system is already in use, that would most likely trump any, supposedly better, new system. As we say in the software business: standard is better than better.