I’m not much of a linker, but I really wanted to save this link.
UPDATE: It goes well with this:
Americans have a deserved reputation for historical amnesia. Three years -- an eon -- have made us imagine that the Afghan war was easy and foreordained.Posted by David Boxenhorn at November 1, 2004 09:00 AMEasy? In 2001, we had nothing there. What had the Clinton administration left in place? No plausible military plan. Virtually no intelligence. No local infrastructure. No neighboring bases. The Afghan Northern Alliance was fractured and weak. And Pakistan was actively supporting the bad guys.
Within days of Sept. 11, the clueless airhead president that inhabits Michael Moore's films and Tina Brown's dinner parties had done this: forced Pakistan into alliance with us, isolated the Taliban, secured military cooperation from Afghanistan's northern neighbors, and authorized a radical war plan involving just a handful of Americans on the ground, using high technology and local militias to utterly rout the Taliban.
President Bush put in place a military campaign that did in two months what everyone had said was impossible: defeat an entrenched, fanatical, ruthless regime in a territory that had forced the great British and Soviet empires into ignominious retreat. Bush followed that by creating in less than three years a fledgling pro-American democracy in a land that had no history of democratic culture and was just emerging from 25 years of civil war.
This is all barely remembered and barely noted. Most amazing of all, John Kerry has managed to transform our Afghan venture into a failure -- a botched operation in which Bush let Osama bin Laden get away because he "outsourced" bin Laden's capture to "warlords" in the battle of Tora Bora.
Outsourced? The entire Afghan war was outsourced. How does Kerry think we won it? How did Mazar-e Sharif, Kabul and Kandahar fall? Stormed by thousands of American GIs? They fell to the "warlords" we had enlisted, supported and directed. It was their militias that overran the Taliban.
Well, isn't Kerry planning on outsourcing our National Security to the UN?
Posted by: jinnderella at November 1, 2004 03:35 PM PermalinkGood points. America does suffer from short-term memory lapses, I fear.
I have deep concerns over our national security if Kerry gets in. Plus I have no faith in his ability to deal with Israel. And domestically, the numbers he espouses just don't make any sense unless he raises everyone's taxes, which he claims he won't do.
I am at the edge of my seat waiting for this election to be over.
Posted by: Stacey at November 1, 2004 04:34 PM PermalinkThanks for reminding us how much was accomplished in such a short time. You could have gone further and pointed out how Bush's doctrine of "with us or against us" coupled with the invasion of Iraq has caused Libya, Pakistan, Saudia Arabia, Jordan, etc. to begin to capture and control the fanatical Islamists in their countries. Can you imagine how much will change if Iraq actually can manage to display some form of democracy in the next year? It could all still go to hell in a hand basket but it could also work and start the changes that will have long term benefits to all.
Posted by: olde fogey at November 2, 2004 05:28 AM Permalink